tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7475829827879308509.post5715779993299692086..comments2024-02-14T15:13:54.775-05:00Comments on Turonistan: Causation or CorrelationTurk Turonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02648721047835980871noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7475829827879308509.post-12378622574896215592011-02-10T13:49:17.907-05:002011-02-10T13:49:17.907-05:00Sorry, my standard of writing was poor. I see I le...Sorry, my standard of writing was poor. I see I left some words out of that last paragraph. <br /><br />My apologizes,<br />JoshJosh Kruschkehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09288700371539530398noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7475829827879308509.post-24461678051837431042011-02-10T13:08:35.737-05:002011-02-10T13:08:35.737-05:00There are no standards of proof in non-engineering...There are no standards of proof in non-engineering fields. This really sad. Question, why did a peer not ask, "how so; and if so, how do we prove it?" This is why peer review doesn't work. The stander should be like in engineering. You test to destruction or failure. Papers should be put up for ridicule.<br />In the peer review process everyone knows there going through it so they're nice so others will be nice to them or if doesn't match what the majority thinks it's not published out of hand.<br /><br />Just my thoughts,<br />JoshJosh Kruschkehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09288700371539530398noreply@blogger.com