...as if a million gun-control advocates suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
The Washington Post published this opinion piece Tuesday night:
I don’t particularly like the AR-15, although it is one of the most popular rifles in the country. Three million have been sold, according to an NRA researcher. But to define it as an assault rifle because of how it looks — with a pistol grip, adjustable stock, flash suppressor and “high capacity” magazine — is silly.
You want to see a dangerous-looking gun, look at the one President Obama was photographed skeet shooting with at Camp David last summer. That shotgun of his was big enough to take down a woolly mammoth. When I pulled the trigger on the AR-15, one high-powered round came out. Maybe I hit something; maybe I didn’t. Obama can’t miss. He could clear a room with one double-barreled blast.
Why ban one and not the other? And once you start banning semiautomatics, where do you stop?
If gun control advocates were truly serious and not just well meaning, they’d be focusing a lot more on education and mental health. For instance, everybody knows that our children are being adversely affected by violent video games. So why aren’t schools deconstructing video games as part of the curriculum, explaining to students how the military uses these same war games to condition troops to kill without remorse?
It just goes on and on like that. This piece is by one of WaPo's local opinion writers, Courtland Milloy.
Absolutely shocking that WaPo would publish something like this.
Posts
2 comments:
I could have spent the next 5 years guessing the author and NEVER have come up with Courtland Milloy.
He has to be the 2nd most liberal member of the Post staff. (No one is more leftist than Dana Milbank)
I think this is a MAJOR groundswell ... or more realistically to provide cover for Congressional failure to pass any gun-control laws.
I agree 100%!
Courtland Milloy?! Impossible!
Post a Comment